Welcome to Zipse at the Track's Two Dozen Days of Derby. Each and every day for the next twenty four, you will find Derby, Derby, and more Derby here on ZATT. So please, if you want to dicuss politics or religion, you are in the wrong place. I have Kentucky Derby Fever, and I hope you do too. So when you visit these pages, be prepared for nothing but Talking Derby. Today, we will discuss the merits of recent Derby favoritism. The results may surprise you. If Eskendereya enters the 2010 Kentucky Derby starting gate, he will undoubtedly be the top choice by bettors. He assured this with his recent romp in the Wood Memorial. An enviable position, to be the Kentucky Derby favorite, right? Maybe, but maybe not. Let’s take a look at the performance of the favorites in the last 30 years: Year Favorite Odds Finish 2009 Friesan Fire 3.80-1 18th 2008 Big Brown 2.40-1 1st 2007 Street Sense 4.90-1 1st 2006 Sweetnorthernsaint 5.50-1 7th 2005 Bellamy Road 2.60-1 7th 2004 Smarty Jones 4.10-1 1st 2003 Empire Maker 2.50-1 2nd 2002 Harlan's Holiday 6.00-1 7th 2001 Point Given 1.80-1 5th 2000 Fusaichi Pegasus 2.30-1 1st 1999 General Challenge (entry) 4.80-1 11th 1998 Indian Charlie 2.70-1 3rd 1997 Captain Bodgit 3.10-1 2nd 1996 Unbridled's Song 3.50-1 5th 1995 Timber Country (entry) 3.40-1 3rd 1994 Holy Bull 2.20-1 12th 1993 Prairie Bayou 4.40-1 2nd 1992 Arazi .90-1 8th 1991 Hansel 2.50-1 10th 1990 Mister Frisky 1.90-1 8th 1989 Easy Goer (entry) .80-1 2nd 1988 Private Terms 3.40-1 9th 1987 Demons Begone 2.20-1 DNF 1986 Snow Chief 2.10-1 11th 1985 Chief's Crown 1.20-1 3rd 1984 Althea (entry) 2.80-1 19th 1983 Marfa (entry) 2.40-1 5th 1982 Air Forbes Won 2.70-1 7th 1981 Proud Appeal (entry) 2.30-1 18th 1980 Rockhill Native 2.10-1 5th A closer look at these results reveal that a total of four favorites have won the Kentucky Derby in the past three decades, a winning percentage of only 13.3%. The average finish for the favorite in this time period is a very surprising 7th place. As you can tell, being the favorite means very little when the race begins. Looking at the winners over these thirty years, we see 13 horses who had double digit odds, and six of them had odds of over 20-1. What does this all mean for this year's favorite, Eskendereya? Nothing, he will not be aware of his own odds. But if you think that it is a foregone conclusion that we will see Eskendereya in the winner's circle, history has taught us that you may be in for a rude awakening. |
April 7, 2010
Will You Back the Derby Favorite?
Posted by Brian Zipse at 2:36 PM
Labels: Kentucky Derby Favorites
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
always something ppl shud be aware of. 20 horses round churchill downs, nothing can be taken for granted. i quite like Eskendereya tho but a derby bet on him wud be full of frailties.
The only time I bet the favorite is in an exotic bet - exacta or trifecta box. (Except for Smarty Jones - wait! he wasn't the favorite)
Eskendereya deserves to be the favorite- but you never know, in a 20 horse stampede...anything can happen.
I'm a 'bad bettor' - I tend to spread my $ - I've never bet on only ONE horse in the Kentucky Derby.
No horse is ever a lock especially not this year. From the way I see it you have the top tier group, which is made of maybe five horses at the most. Then you have the second group, which is not far off from the top group. The second group has a lot of talent, and the ability to step up if anything should go wrong with the faves. Personally, I believe there are even some third stringers this year that are pretty capable of pulling an upset. Though, I cannot find fault with anyone who wishes to back a horse who is perfect over dirt and as a three year old.
You cheat. 30 years for a data base? Northern Dancer was foaled in 1961 and appears in male and female side of Eskendereya so you have to go back 50 years. In doing that winning favorites rise to 28%(includes Forward Pass)and makes a bet on Eskendereya all the more plausible. Right?
RG
Good points one and all! You are correct, R.G. Had I used a different sample number of years, the results would have been different, however; the farther you go back in history the less you find in common to what you see in the current Derby. In other words, very large fields and less preps before Louisville. In that way, I feel good about the sample number I chose to utilize.
Post a Comment